User talk:MSGJ

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

Question from JaneBetTol (22:31, 29 September 2024)

I need to correct a mistake that a member of the public added to my bio. I tried three times to do it and save it on my laptop but couldn’t do it. Not sure why. Now trying on my iPhone. Can you help me? --JaneBetTol (talk) 22:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Safiahhafiez (18:00, 9 October 2024)

Hi there, can I outright edit a page that needs amendment if I am the source of the authentic content? Why would it be removed later on by the creator? For example, I credited my name in my own work which was not included. --Safiahhafiez (talk) 18:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:06, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I Saw a creature on your userpage

Hello there, i saw your image. Who was is 77.77.219.225 (talk) 20:52, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:QuickStatements link

Template:QuickStatements link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Valencia9376 (14:35, 14 October 2024)

Martin, Good Morning. I’m in the US in the Mountain Standard Time zone. In the article on automorphic numbers I think it’s missing the number 1951 as an automorphic number. I wanted to point that out to the author on the article. I may be wrong, I’m not a mathematician per se, so I’m asking if that number should be included in the list of automorphic numbers. Phillip --Valencia9376 (talk) 14:35, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an expert but 1951 does not seem to meet the criteria described on that page. The square of 1951 is 3806401 — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:34, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

g'day

saw you in the template - just a small FYI, tried creating a fresh assessment,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Zheg%C3%ABr_Incident_(1999)

and the rogue 'start' has come from somewhere I dont know. Trust all is well JarrahTree 13:14, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like what you've done there is fine. Military History won't allow a B-class rating until their checklist has been completed, so it will sit on start until a member of their project assesses it. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I am not auf fait with their internal eccentricities, appreciate your response - the other new simple new category items via rater seem fine. cheers JarrahTree 13:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On Kyoga Nakamura project rating.

I was using rater to update article class (obviously not stub) and to add Singapore wikiproject. Rater added the living=no and I did not notice it as I did not touch the biography project. I should have double checked before submitting it. ~ JASWE (talk) 12:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I have reported this at WT:RATER — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: living=no

I have no idea why but rater will sometimes automatically add it even when there is already a BLP parameter. This time I forgot to remove it. PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:18, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Reh688 on Wikipedia:Writing better articles (08:53, 27 October 2024)

My account and devices hack --Reh688 (talk) 08:53, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Reh688 on User:Reh688 (09:56, 27 October 2024)

Hacker attack --Reh688 (talk) 09:56, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Shakman

I think I found a bug in the Rater tool. It sets the living to no for some reason. Alaney2k (talk) 02:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Tagging Indonesian topics brings out some strange things at times, point taken, will check...JarrahTree 09:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK - I see the BLP yes has been put in and when the template is edited, it ignores that and enters the living=no by default, I would in certain circumstances, say that the template/rater doesnt recognise it...(rather than the editor applying it) however, shoot the piano I say..JarrahTree 09:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - Have looked at one of the 12 articles that exists with the issue - and what has had is Tom.Reding has AWB'ed the blp=yes into the template header - and this does extactly the same if living=yes for the template - it creates the BLP banner above the template box. I hadnt checked at the edit history to look at previous edits to see the AWB of blp=yes when editing them, and in fact I will now simply remove the living=no are they are redundant and the result of some default mechanism in rater or the template that I have no understanding of how to suggest to you or other template fidlerers to do something about (ie when blp is entered, living is disallowed, or vice versa).. Thanks for reading this, and trust it makes sense to you. In this case, the piano, the player and the tune require prejudicial adjustment in whatever the best form is considered reasonable. JarrahTree 10:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see User_talk:Evad37/rater.js#Stop_killing_people for more detail — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

haha and I thought it was the banner shell/template box editors were the issue... thanks for the link... JarrahTree 10:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For that matter, read the previous message above for further enjoyment. JarrahTree 10:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Luis von Ahn

That's weird. WP:RATER defaulted to adding "living=no" even though it already had "blp=yes". I'll bring it up with whoever manages the tool. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see its a known issue... – Muboshgu (talk) 20:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323

Online events:

New: Asian women | Geofocus: Islands Q-Z | Women in engineering

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

Annual Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) is an online campaign designed to boost
Asian content on Wikipedia each November.
Unreferenced articles backlog drive. These Wikiproject clean-up lists offer a start
to November's backlog drive, e.g. Women's History and Women writers

Tip of the month:

Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed images at
search.creativecommons.org/

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Articles with World Waterfall identifiers

A tag has been placed on Category:Articles with World Waterfall identifiers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Articles with BGCI identifiers

A tag has been placed on Category:Articles with BGCI identifiers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Liz, it's a bit weird when you send a message saying the page will deleted after 7 days but then you delete the category immediately using C4. I would suggest using one system or the other, but the mixture is somewhat confusing — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:41, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protected pages

Hey, can you clear out the protected hoax talk pages from the banner categories? Gonnym (talk) 15:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:40, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! (one seems to have slipped by Wikipedia talk:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Alan MacMasters) Gonnym (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Wasn't there a few minutes ago — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]