I agree with Nick04 on this. Admittedly, I'm not sure if this is a cleanup candidate for an article about a notable forum or if it's a vanity page. I'll list it for cleanup as well. - Lucky 6.9 18:15, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I think Megatokyo is more of a cleanup. I vote to keep this article. It does need lots of work, getting rid of POV (one example, "Seawaffle, one of the newer mods, watches this forum while eating babies"). We certainly don't need to know specific moderators for each forum (IMO). But Greasy should certainly go. Nick04 18:35, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Sounds good. It's on the cleanup page now, but I'm having trouble getting the boilerplate to show. - Lucky 6.9 18:51, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I took the liberty of reverting the article to the version prior to the "eating babies" and "garbage heap of the internet" type comments. -- Cyrius|✎ 18:51, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Ah, vandals! I thought it looked too involved to be original. Looks great now. Should greasy be speed-deleted since the redirect no longer applies? - Lucky 6.9 19:04, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
geeze it's a web comic forum page, let some levity in (curently the entry sounds too self importent)
Beter uze yer spel chek. and rimember to leev yer signatoor... uh, sugnotur... uh, jus put yer x on yer post. - Lucky 6.9 07:04, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I created the article because, as the article states, it is certainly one of the more popular English forums. Something Awful, to compare, has an extensive article. I'll work on the article. -- Slowking Man 19:25, Jun 18, 2004 (UTC)
