Talk:Antaios
tell me why it is disputed? tell my why ?Aziri 12:19, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
it is to stupid to say the factuality of the article is disputed without any reason.
Let's see... It mentions "Berber" every couple of sentences; what evidence is there for the claim that this non-existent mythological person was Berber, other than the fact that a legend connects him with Tingis, and another legend connects Tingis with the city of that name, modern Tangier? What are your sources? Why is the Berber name of a character in ancient Greek mythology at all relevant - especially since there can be no evidence that that was his ancient Berber name, if he had one? - Mustafaa 09:27, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)
haha, i m not happy with your reasons, i have the source , but i won't help you to read theme, the writer was an historian and archeologist, there are also other source, but i find it too strange to say it is disputed just because you don't belive me or you don't like that or you don't know that . i can just say : hahahaha. Aziri 18:50, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- You could say that but it would not be very helpful to the purpose of writing an encyclopedia. If you have sources, please do present them. Rmhermen 03:34, Aug 4, 2004 (UTC)
but if you don't have sources to deny onething , pleas look for them before you say it is disputed without any helpful argument. furhter i don't time to give the source in this weather with this arguments . thus pleas don't claim anything just because you didn't get it on the school ! (aziri)
okke, i will give some names , but they are existant en non-disputed however you didn't get it on school : Diodorus Lucanus Apollodorus (old personages how wonderd the sepulchre of antaios) and this is the one gave the attention for its sepulchre : Plutarchus, and this is the one how visted his sepulchre (a berber archeologist and historian , further he is not disputed however you don't him and i will give nosource about him) :M.A'ashi. for details i have raly notime . goodlucky , and atleats i tell you : don't write that an article is dispited just because you don't know it. ... (aziri)
i didn't like give source , because i found that the disputy was not honest , it is easy to say that the factuality is diwputed just because you don't know that or because you cannot expalain that / 1+ http://www.minculture.gov.ma/arabe/ar_Medinas12.htm (ar.) : the name tanger is called to the wife of antaios " tnijis".
2+http://www.tamurth.net/article.php3?id_article=2 more informations ( the son of tinjis builded tanger and called it to hin mother "tindjis") .
3+ the source : http://www.tawalt.com/archive.cfm?lg=_tz&mStartRow=76 : i got the informations of the firts areticle (that was disputed according to you ) from this article , the article is writen by an archeologist and historian who visted the sepulchre of antaios . (i don't think you can say anythinkg against that) .
4+ http://www.theoi.com/Kronos/Antaios.html (just a link about the berber hero "antaios").
now , i would answer the wonders of mustafaa : why the moslims don't dispute the "Kaab" (the black Qibla of the moslims) : it is from the paradis (according to their islam and that paradis is not existant just in the brains of the moslim ) and further it is made by ibrahim and his son ismael if i remember good because allah spoked with them and said that they have to that . is that existant ? is that not on-existant ? and tell me why it is not disputed that heraclis killed antaios and that is not disputed however they are non-existanat ? . i don't need your answers , ik know them . (aziri).
Start a discussion about improving the Antaios page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Antaios" page.
