Jump to content

Talk:Linear trend estimation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Textbook

[edit]

can anybody contribute some standart textbook about time series analysis and trend estimation?

Just moving the following suggestion off of the main page and onto the talk page [The lkoimnkj"Real data is autocorrelated" section in need of expansion: examples.] Tristanreid 22:23, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trend Analysis merger

[edit]

Don't Merge. 13-September-2006: The term "trend analysis" is a broader issue, of which trend estimation is a procedure in statistical mathematics. Keep "trend analysis" as a separate article, to expand with information from other fields of study, beyond statistical methods. Compare gHits (Google hits) of the terms: "trend analysis" hits 2,940,000, while old "trend estimation" hits 71,300 = 41 times more webpages on "trend analysis" with no Wikipedia copycat webpages, yet; meanwhile, "trend estimation" has enough detail to warrant the separate article be kept: the 2 terms are not synonymous. -Wikid77 08:49, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious re R-squared and significance

[edit]

The section "Goodness of fit (R-squared) and trend" currently says

A noisy series can have a very low r^2 value but a very high significance in a test for the presence of trend.

This strikes me as dubious since the RHS variable time is unbounded and hence its variance goes up as you extend the series. Since it is unsourced I'm going to delete it in a couple days unless there are objections. If the r-squared is low, then the noise must have high variance. With high noise variance, to get a strong t-statistic you'd need a lot of data points. But with a lot of data points, for given noise variance most of the variance in the dependent variable will be variance in the deterministic trend component of the data, and all of that variance is captured given a large number of data points, giving a high r-squared. So with non-stationary RHS variable "time", you can't get a good t-statistic without also having a good r-squared. Duoduoduo (talk) 15:49, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Linear trend estimation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics

[edit]

Population consist of a linear Trend 43.230.214.196 (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tone and scope

[edit]

This article reads like a tutorial or textbook, it should adhere to encyclopedic tone.

Secondly, its scope needs to be reconsidered; as it is, it simply duplicates simple linear regression. There's already Curve fitting, covering non-rectilinear trends (formulated in a linear model or not). Then there's Line fitting, for geometrical fitting methods. Other related articles are Decomposition of time series and Seasonal adjustment

Looking at Wikipedia in other languages, the one in French Ajustement affine seems promising. fgnievinski (talk) 21:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]