Jump to content

Talk:Benjamin Franklin True Patriot Act

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vote for deletion (inconclusive)

[edit]

This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Benjamin Franklin True Patriot Act. There was no consensus. dbenbenn | talk 00:28, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)


"Sneak and peak"

[edit]

are "sneak and peak searches" really spelled that way, or are they "sneak and peek searches"? I've seen it spelled the first way so many times... is it a sort of John Dean - Howard Dean - John Kerry sort of thing? Even CNN says John Dean sometimes... so does my AP Gov't teacher... ugen64 02:31, Feb 5, 2004 (UTC)

"Sneak and peek" is the correct spelling. Was the spelling wrong in the bill, or was it spelled wrong just in this article? Fuzheado 02:39, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC)
it is "peek" in the text of the bill, as per the link at the bottom of the page. --1pezguy 02:19, Jul 23, 2004 (UTC)

What does "looks to review" mean? RickK 03:12, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC)

In the bill's text, it's "sneak and peak". "Looks to review" means that it will review the other PATRIOT Act, should it be signed into law (as in John Kerry "looks to defeat" Bush if he is nominated by the Democrats). ugen64 23:21, Feb 7, 2004 (UTC)

"Conservative"

[edit]

I removed the adjective conservative because the context was disparaging to conservatism. The USA Patriot Act is not conservative in any of the forms described on the political conservatism page that was linked to. Perhaps totalitarian, authoritarian, or statist would work better in context.--mcornelius 23:20, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)

"Perhaps totalitarian, authoritarian, or statist would work better in context."

Ouch.

Is this bill dead by now? It was presented over a year ago - the session's over. Or was it reintroduced?--Fermatprime 19:04, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

When will this be voted upon?

[edit]

Anyone know? --Rebroad 16:51, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

If you're referring to the VFD, see above. Mateo SA | talk 02:53, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)

Out of interest...

[edit]

... given that the FISC of Review has stated that foregin intelligence organisations can, in fact, become involved in criminal investigations if necessary, what would repealing section 218 do? - Ta bu shi da yu 14:20, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this page

[edit]

THis page should be deleted. We can't have a wikipedia page for every piece of failed legislation. Simsong (talk) 05:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Benjamin Franklin True Patriot Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Benjamin_Franklin_True_Patriot_Act&oldid=1199849491"