Talk:Titoism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Titoism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Yugoslavia Top‑importance

	Titoism is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Section sizes

Section size for Titoism (11 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	3,603	3,603
Background	4,290	4,290
Tito–Stalin split	5,750	5,750
Ideology	9,286	9,286
History	7,257	7,257
Reception	12,376	16,386
National communism or proletarian internationalism	4,010	4,010
See also	647	647
References	30	5,396
Bibliography	5,366	5,366
Further reading	1,534	1,534
Total	54,149	54,149

Retrospect

In retrospect, I can't help but wonder how this principle named after Tito and his application of it in Yugoslavia can be called "nationalistic". The whole point was to have state sovereignty, not national sovereignty, far from it. --Joy [shallot] 11:01, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

"Religious aspect"

A propo this paragraph: "The religious elements of Titoism are characterized by strong loyalty, admiration, and at an extreme, fanatical devotion to Tito, who by means of the cult of personality that surrounded him, was believed by some to be a deity or alternatively, to be more than a mortal human-being."

This paragraph seems terribly POV and very far-fetched. I don't think anyone saw Tito as a deity or "more than a mortal", despite the whole cult of his name. If nobody complains, I will remove the paragraph. --Dejan Čabrilo 2 July 2005 03:52 (UTC)

"or even those who respected Russian culture." - till someone gives a reference I ll remove it. Luka Jačov 18:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It should resurrect and stay permanently, if it wasn't for Titoism, my people would not have received human rights. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.95.114.241 (talk) 01:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tito-portret-jovanovic.jpg

Image:Tito-portret-jovanovic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

General help

This is an important part of 20th century history but lacking in context and details. Is anyone interested in improving it? Obviously references would be from Đilas [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ted71 (talk • contribs) 06:46, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dead source

Hello @ShanGuy37, I'm pinging you about this addition of yours. The specific problem is that http://www.rcmlibya.org/English/RCM%20(1).pdf is dead and all of its snapshots on Wayback Machine are too, as if it never were up. Were you able to access this source back in August 2020 when you added it, or did you carry it over from another article? Thanks in advance. –Vipz (talk) 15:33, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Turlejska

@Vipz:, @LeonChrisfield:, Turlejska was pulled from the Polish language article. Don't have access to the book in the libraries I have access to. I've reached out to Polish colleagues to see if they can find it. I'll see if I can pull and English language source from what I have access to, and if my Polish collegaues come up with nothing, I should be able to buy a copy of the book to be delivered. The timeline for this though is unlikely to be resolved until after the new year, apologies. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 11:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vipz:, @LeonChrisfield:, I now have Turlejska's book, and I'm working through it with some Polish colleagues to provide full citations. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 21:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vipz:, @LeonChrisfield: the Turlejska references have now all been split out and quotations provided. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 18:09, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]