Delete. I'm so amazed by the non-notability of this! Saint will 11:50, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete: A camp, but a concisely written article. Geogre 12:21, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. I'm tempted to say keep, as we have plenty of articles on tiny non-notable villages, suburbs, schools etc., but there's really no information of value here. If the author can make it interesting I will change my vote, as I think Wikipedia should in general be covering topics considered non-notable by dead tree encyclopedias. — Trilobite(Talk) 02:20, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. My major concern with this type of article is that even though it may be relevant today, what will its value be in ten yearsfive years two years from now? Does the topic of this article have sufficient staying power that it will be on anyone's radar in the short term (never mind the long term)? I think this does not cut it. Denni☯ 02:04, 2004 Sep 1 (UTC)
Keep. What harm is it doing? It's relevant to thousands of people, which is more than can be said about many articles here. ··gracefool |☺ 04:16, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Non-notable. Andris 20:01, Sep 4, 2004 (UTC)
