Talk:Hollingsworth v. Virginia

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I moved the article, as the citation is not part of the style of the case, hence not properly part of the article title.

More background

How did this case come to be before the Supreme Court? What amendment was in question? RJFJR (talk) 19:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by scholar mentioned in article

[26 January 2013: Seth Barrett Tillman adds:] It is not surprising that historian David Kyvig agreed with Lee. When Kyvig wrote in 1996, prior to Tillman's publication in 2005, no other theory was on the table. In contrast to historian David Kyvig, Professor Forrest McDonald -- a period historian -- considered both points of view, and adopted Tillman's position. McDonald's considered views are available for public inspection.[1] 89.100.206.151 (talk) 20:18, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything in the Forrest McDonald letter that mentions or alludes to Hollingsworth or to Article V of the Constitution. It only discusses Article I. So, I think it would be sufficient at the end of this Wikiedia article to mention that Kyvig opined prior to publication of the 2005 Texas Law Review article. Also see WP:Primary ("Material based purely on primary sources should be avoided").63.119.36.186 (talk) 22:42, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]