Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forcey Christian Middle School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 03:04, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
Tiny, non-notable middle school. Delete. Neutralitytalk 21:33, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep as with all the others. Christopher Parham 21:34, 2005 May 17 (UTC)
- Keep - I've seen far worse articles kept on here, why not keep this one, jguk 21:55, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Bogus (non-policy) mass nomination, clogging the VFD system - notability is still not a listed deletion criterion. And, you know, there are lots of people following after your mass-nominations trying to expand the stubs - have you considered it may be a more helpful move that doesn't piss people off to list these somewhere other than VFD first, so that those people actually have a chance to expand them? Surely the integrity of Wikipedia doesn't need you to swoop in there before they possibly can - David Gerard 23:22, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable. The article helpfully lists the faculty, but without dates the information will go stale and is useless. Quale 00:14, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. David puts it well. The generally massive keep responses to nearly all listings in the current campaign show that it goes utterly contrary to what Wikipedians will wear. This is a perfectly good stub and it's absolutely baffling that it can be seriously listed. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 00:51, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Silver Spring, Maryland per my school article policy. Kelly Martin 02:40, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, doesnt ind notab. and its goal is the same as any other US Christian school. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gazpacho (talk • contribs) 04:00 UTC, 18 May 2005
- Keep, good article, important topic. Kappa 07:20, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:VAIN. Radiant_* 08:55, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Lupin 13:55, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Verifiable and NPOV. Schools are an excellent entry point for new Wikipedians. --Unfocused 14:28, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as per Kelly
Brown--er Martin. Master Thief Garrett 03:20, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply] - Keep and make room for extra servings of BEEFSTEW. —RaD Man (talk) 07:53, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Please stop wasting other users' time which should be spent writing articles. CalJW 18:55, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless we want a stub for every small school everywhere. CDThieme 01:21, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete = not notable. NoAccount 02:59, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Your account is 3 days old, that's notable. —RaD Man (talk) 03:08, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. (1)We don't even have a policy about schools yet, (2)schools are important and should be included, (3)this massive deletion campaign is terrible, and against the spirit of wikipedia. Introduce a limit of 3 vfd nominations per day. Project Schoolwatch. --Zantastik 22:25, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable school worthy of inclusion. User:GRider/Schoolwatch Klonimus 23:39, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.