Talk:Age

Untitled

Shouldn't we split the AGE acronyms onto a separate disamb rather than redirect to Age ? Rod57 (talk) 11:20, 7 December 2010 (UTC) --113.199.246.225 (talk) 06:15, 3 July 2011 (UTC)i like to change my age[reply]

Minimum age of chairperson in India

More about age Vikas202130 (talk) 01:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article should exist on age

In addtition to ageing, there is also age. There is getting to seventy, but there is also being thirty. Age in that usage is like generation, but keyed to specific age and the trends and tendencies of being at certain ages. This might be already at developmental stages. -Inowen (nlfte) 22:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. "Age" is a characteristic of objects, just like size, color etc. and should have its own page. Finnigami (talk) 06:15, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would certainly expect a general article on "age" to exist, but I'm having a hard time seeing how one could fill such an article up. We do link to Wiktionary in the sidebar, which is what we usually do when only a dictionary-definition could be written about the topic. Finnigami, you can still see what you had started writing here, it had been reverted seemingly since it wasn't sufficiently long for it to be a standalone article. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:00, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have enough content on hand to instantly fill up the entire page myself, but that doesn't mean that content isn't out there. Compare it to the Article on Size. It could definitely be filled up with enough content. Finnigami (talk) 18:03, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There really is no reason at all to have an "Age" article when we have the Ageing article. What would an "Age" article be about to distinguish itself? Going by that permalink above, would it be about objects instead of living beings? Numbers? We also have articles about biological development...such as the Development of the human body article. An "Age" article falls under WP:NOTADICTIONARY. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 02:54, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And as for what is mentioned in the move request below, I don't see this as a WP:Broad-concept article matter. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 02:57, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Missing article

I have the idea an article about the age of a person, especially the legal definition and consequences, is missing. Madyno (talk) 12:23, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 November 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Uncontroversial move, can be requested at WP:RMTR, but since someone else has already opposed the move of the dab it will be moved back to the base title at least until a broad topic article is written. (non-admin closure) – Thjarkur (talk) 09:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Age (Disambiguation) → Age (disambiguation) – Disambiguation pages are supposed to have the "d" be lowercase. I made this one on accident but the correct one already exists (it redirects to the current page with a capital "D"). The content is on page with the wrong title and needs to replace the empty article with the correct title. Finnigami (talk) 06:36, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Adarsh PB Musicworld age 15.

Adarsh PB Musicworld age Adarsh PB (talk) 07:56, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Age (Disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Age (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Age (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 15:15, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"AGE" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect AGE has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 10 § AGE until a consensus is reached. MrBauer24 (talk) 00:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]