Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unequals

POV rant, article title has nothing to do with article, original research. Choose one. Rick K 06:42, Aug 12, 2004 (UTC)

hmmm, so many choices, so little time, yet only one conclusion: Delete. Indrian 07:01, Aug 12, 2004 (UTC)
Total POV, doubtlessly covered better in other articles, although the title is at least slightly related. Delete. -RedWordSmith 07:17, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Not encyclopedic. Kim Bruning 07:22, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete, for all the reasons stated above. But some of this material should be somewhere, because it is (in rough and ready form) standard critique of the oversimplified free market as presented in simple economics text books. Any ideas where the salvageable stuff could go, anyone? seglea 07:35, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Completely POV and needs to go, the sooner the better. Deb 11:48, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete POV rant. I saw nothing worth salvaging. Rossami 12:13, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete: Original research. Some articles are more unequal than others. Geogre 13:04, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Deleting this proletariat page is just a knee-jerk reaction by those who control the means of production. DELETE away!!!!! ;-) Terrapin 20:41, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Heh. I like the way that economists are actually the ones who profit the most from free markets. Delete. Lacrimosus 21:18, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. This sounds like basic Neo-Marxism to me. It is non-encyclopedic, ranting, and POV. There is actually no original research involved and nothing needs to be salvaged from it. Any concepts involved in this rant can be explained and articulated much better by any topic having to do with Marxism or Proletariatism. Plus, as a liberal economist ("free-trade economist"), I simply find it insulting and annoying. Skyler 02:39, Aug 13, 2004 (UTC)
Redir to Equality to deter reappearance. Davodd 08:57, Aug 13, 2004 (UTC)
- Good idea. I agree with that. All content should be deleted, though, as there is nothing of value to be merged. Skyler 11:54, Aug 13, 2004 (UTC)
Delete and quickly. Nothing but a personal rant. --LeeHunter 18:48, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)