Talk:New Paltz (village), New York

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

New York (state): Hudson Valley High‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as Mid-importance).

New Paltz (village), New York → New Paltz, New York

It's a village in New York. Should it be moved to New Paltz, New York or New Paltz? I say New Paltz, New York since it's not well-known outside of NY State. Rhobite 02:05, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)

A town that has a twentieth of the population density of a village of half the population? That isn't a town, it's a smudge on the map! good grief! Who calls that a town? Don't they hold censuses and whatnot in NY? --Tony Sidaway|Talk 00:30, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Out East, what they call a "town" is what normal people like you and I call a "township". I have a more objection in general to including every place the U.S. census counts, just because we have numbers for those places. Given that they are there, I conditionally oppose this move, but would not oppose weeding out some of them entirely. Gene Nygaard 01:25, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)

oppose. This is far from the smallest of towns in NY. Blame Ram-Bot for the additions of all the little towns and villages and hamlets if you'd like, but thisis where it should be, given all of that. - UtherSRG 14:43, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)

Comments on move and editing

Thanks for keeping this article at its current location for now. It's listed on Wikipedia:Requested moves and we'll see how that works out. I'm sure it'll get moved to either New Paltz or New Paltz, New York but in the mean time, please let it be. Also, there is no policy disallowing links to commercial sites from Wikipedia. The local newspaper should have a link, for example.

It's a little exasperating to have the same user continue to come in and revert this article, despite the numerous style problems people have pointed out. The latest version now has a paragraph which says "original position and veil of ignorance are concepts developed by John Rawls that are intended to help people write laws that govern the distribution of wealth in societies." I hope it goes without saying that this is off topic for an article about the village of New Paltz. Rhobite 01:31, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)

That's actually been in several of the earlier "preverts" as well. Weird. --Ray Radlein 02:39, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)

Broken links and grammar

The anonymous user who frequently reverts this article claims that it's due to bad grammar and broken links. I checked every external link in this article and they work fine, and I can't see any obvious grammar problems. Please use the talk page and explain what the issue is. Rhobite 16:49, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)

I dont know what thats all about but I live in New Paltz and theres very little differance between the village and the town of New Paltz. Also I don't know anyone who commutes to New York City from New Paltz its 90 miles away, well maybe i know one or two but they only go down there 2 times a week at most and they certenly are not in any kind of majority . Personaly I hate Mayor Jason West not because hes doing the whole gay wedding thing i just don't like him. He brought so much attenchin to the town and himself little good came out of it, the media flooded the streets and there where (and still are) tons of torists and it just made it that much more difficult to smoke pot.

I just wanted to say that

He brought so much attenchin to the town and himself little good came out of it, the media flooded the streets and there where (and still are) tons of torists and it just made it that much more difficult to smoke pot.

may well be the best. comment. ever. --Ray Radlein 06:01, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)

I was more than glad to see him NOT re-elected. He looked SO dejected, it was enormously thirst quenching to all who despised him.

Minority groups in New Paltz

This space intentionally left blank.

Duplicate paragraphs on politics

The end of the history section as well as the paragraph on politics have largely the same information, with one contradiction. The history section says Julia Walsh is a Green Party member but the politics section says she is a democrat. The two paragraphs should be merged and the party affiliation of Julia Walsh should be clarified. --Beirne 00:06, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Residents section

Removed "Daniel J. Torres" from the notable residents list. I cannot find anywhere on google that can tie anyone with this name to New Paltz in a 'notable' way. If you revert - please put some evidence here to back it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caidh (talk • contribs) 02:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Jason Torres lives in town.--otherl left 14:10, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nicknames for New Paltz

This space intentionally left blank.

Over policing in New Paltz, DUI scam

I happen to agree with unsigned on the police issue. The motto for the town should read "Welcome to New Paltz, you're under arrest". I can't even tell you how many times I've had my car damaged by police dogs, my things broken, and them finding nothing. Then laughing that my car was trashed. The probable cause for them is, there's a person who's under 30 and driving a car. I avoid driving through the town whenever possible. People are afraid of the predatory tactics in the town. People are afraid of the police.

Secondly, in regards to dirty, filthy drinker drivers. Let's consider the fact that every major parking lot in the town threatens car impound if you leave your car overnight. This CREATES drinking and driving. People do not know where to park and get put into the situation. Apparently there's a non-listed park and ride across from Stewart's that might be safe to park in. There's no signs. There's no literature. There's only threats and police swarming like sharks at 2am.

On one occasion I had a a driver who thought she was fine, she had 3 drinks over the course of the night. An officer was stalking the bar we were at so I marched her over to the officer and demanded that she be breathalyzed before she got in her car. The officer was ANGRY. He reluctantly performed the test. But then refused to let us see the numbers and said.. "I dunno.. MAYBE she can drive". This means, he wanted her to get in the car so he could pull her over despite our encounter so he could get the collar. WHAT A DICK. We took a taxi ($20 bucks one way) and requested that we could leave the car at the bar. The bar owner had to write a special note to stop the car from being toed.

New Paltz, has Town police, State Police, Campus Police, Sheriffs, and you occasionally see Environmental police and rangers. From what I hear. The police arrested 150 collage kids last week. People who are trying to invest their money and time into a career only to get a black mark on their record that will haunt them forever.

Police are a necessary element in society. Without them there would be total anarchy. However over policing feels like tyranny. New Paltz is a tyrannical police shark tank, and the parking lots are a set up that promote drunk driving. It's probably known by the police and town that it's a set up and they don't care because ruining lives equals money. It's also great business for "Tow-Riffic" who seems to be in kahoots with the whole scam. It gives the town a bad name.

184.74.239.106 (talk) 17:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC) Not saying. I fear police and I obey the law. ^[1][reply]

References

^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWkBZd6VQks

Halloween sources

I have conducted interviews with several local residents about Halloween in New Paltz and published the results in a series of articles. I hope that an editor may find some of this information useful in developing the Halloween section of the article, as New Paltz itself gives Halloween more weight than the present sources are able to indicate. The kicker is that, should any of these article be considered, the editor will have to request it be whitelisted in order to reference it. The publisher's site has been blacklisted, but there is precedent for whitelisting individual articles that are considered verifiable. These are the article URLs:
http://new-york-travel.suite101.com/article.cfm/haunted_hasbrouck_carries_on_a_scary_tradition
http://holiday-entertaining.suite101.com/article.cfm/new_paltz_halloween_parade_open_to_all
http://sculptingmaterials.suite101.com/article.cfm/night_of_100_pumpkins_draws_new_paltz_artists
http://pagan-wiccan-practice.suite101.com/article.cfm/samhain_in_new_paltz
http://dutch-history.suite101.com/article.cfm/huguenot_streets_historical_halloween_event
http://kids-holiday-activities.suite101.com/article.cfm/new_paltz_teen_seen_haunts_community
The first two are, in my opinion, the most valuable, because they contain historical information which was new to me.--otherl left 14:22, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi otherlleft. My gut instinct is that these sources don't pass WP:RS as the site doesn't display a "reputation for fact-checking and accuracy". If it did then I wouldn't be objected to you using them as citations within the article, but I don't believe that they'd be acceptable as external links. I've posted this at WP:RSN and you're welcome to contribute to the discussion there. If the consensus there is that the site meets WP:RS than I wouldn't object to letting you cite the article without going through the normal COI routine, as it is obvious that you know the gist of the COI editing guidelines. Them From Space 23:10, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The information does not appear to have any unique scholarly basis – they are just general articles. Accordingly, the links should not be added as they do not clearly satisfy WP:EL. Per WP:NOTDIR Wikipedia does not attempt to list all relevant links. Johnuniq (talk) 01:42, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem - I found that some of the interview subjects contributed previously undocumented historical information, which is why I suggested the review. I won't participate in the RS discussion because I've as yet been unsuccessful in getting the editorial staff at Suite101 to seriously consider any changes. Cheers!--otherl left 12:24, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWkBZd6VQks

[1]