Talk:Messier 7

Untitled

I took out the expansion tag but I could not find the article in the list of rquests for expansion. The article is pretty decent now I think. --Kalsermar 16:31, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus^(talk) 04:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ptolemy Cluster → Messier 7 — The name "Ptolemy Cluster" is not as commonly used as "Messier 7" or "M7" for this star cluster. A Google search for "Messier 7 -Wikipedia" versus "Ptolemy Cluster -Wikipedia" demonstrates that Messier 7 is much more frequently used as the name for this object. Dr. Submillimeter 11:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

Survey - in support of the move

Support - See my rationale above. Dr. Submillimeter 11:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Ptolemy Cluster gets a negligible number of ghits compared to, say, the Beehive Cluster. It appears to be a relatively little-used name, so Messier 7 makes more sense. Otherwise I have no strong opinion on the matter. Thanks. — RJH (talk) 19:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - never ever heard about Ptolemy Cluster before. Rursus 00:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey - in opposition to the move

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

SEDs

[1] - list it there, but I have noticed that a lot of nebulae/molecular clouds/clusters have nicknames. Thanks, CarpD 5/04/07

SEDS.org is an unreliable website. Most of their pages contain questionable or out of date information. SOme of their pages are not even referenced. Do not use their website. Dr. Submillimeter 00:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, I did not noticed the .org vs .edu. The page was setup nicely that I did not noticed. Thanks, CarpD 7/04/07.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Messier 7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141113224559/http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/gallery/sciencePhotos/image.php?gallery_id=2&image_id=87 to http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/gallery/sciencePhotos/image.php?gallery_id=2&image_id=87

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Astronomy: Astronomical objects C‑class Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]