Jump to content

Talk:Jayavarman VII

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Someone should check out this site: http://angkor1431.tripod.com/index/id19.html

perhaps the author would consent to its content being used.

[edit]

Jayavarman 2 spent his early years as a hostage prince in the court of Majapahit in Java. He was sent to Camdoia to establish a nhew Javanese colony- but instead rebelled- which lead to his military defeat and the sacking of his cities by the Javanese. Angkor Wat was also designed and supervised by Javanese architects, a scaled-up model of Prambanan. three are several insciptijs on Ankor which give thanks and tribute to the Javanese architects.Starstylers (talk) 13:17, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

rather old

[edit]

Hi!The article reads: "Also in 1178, Jayavarman came to historical prominence by leading a Khmer army that ousted the invaders. At the time, he may already have been in his 60s. Returning to the capital, he found it in disorder. He put an end to the disputes between warring factions and in 1181 was crowned king himself"
This implies he is over 60 and rules for another 40 years. It is, of course, not impossible, but a rather extraordinary claim, which requires extraordinary verification.

All the best
Wikirictor (talk) 06:26, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The intro sentence gives his birth year as 1125, that would have made him 57 yrs old in 1178. I agree, while not totally implausible, it would be exceptional. The approximate years of his reign are fairly consistent in the various sources. I can't find, however, any source for his birth year. I think that 1125 is very suspect. His father ruled from 1150 to 1160. Assuming that this was at or near the "prime of his life", Jayavarman could have been born later than 1125. All of the information from this era comes either from Khmer chronicles, Cham chronicles or Chinese records, each of which emphasizes certain aspects (i.e. their own glory) while downplaying others and contradict each other more often than agreeing.
This article is misleading or just plain wrong in other aspects as well. Upon his father's death, Jayavarman's cousin (or possibly brother), Yasovarman II, became king although Jayavarman probably had the better claim. For reasons unknown to us, Jayavarman didn't seek the throne, however, choosing instead to sojourn in Vijaya, the central City-State of the Cham Mandala. During this time, he inserted himself into internal Cham politics, making allies of a certain faction of Cham princes and consequently enemies of another faction. According to Andrew David Hardy and Mauro Cucarzi in Champa and the Archaeology of Mỹ Sơn (2009), the Chinese version of events (that Angkor was invaded, sacked and occupied by the Cham in 1177-1178) is unreliable at best. Information from both Khmer and Cham chronicles indicates that, after the relative outsider Tribhuvanadityavarman assassinated Yasovarman and took the throne, Jayavarman lobbied (or maybe manipulated) the Cham to attack Angkor to unseat the usurper. In fact, Jayavarman himself may have led the Cham army that took Angkor in 1177. Upon the success of this campaign (which was a land campaign, not the naval one reported in the Chinese records), contemporary Cham inscriptions tell us that Jayavarman, with the Cham factions allied to him (including at least two Cham princes, probably including Vidyanandana) turned on the Vijaya Cham faction and took Angkor for himself based on his birthright. After consolidating power and bringing all of the empire and much of Champa under his control, he sent the two Cham princes and their armies back to Vijaya to maintain Cambodian authority as a reward for their support in his quest for the throne. However, once given authority in their homeland, his former Cham allies became "unreliable" and attempted to assert independence, prompting Jayavarman's invasions of Champa in 1190-1191. Cham inscriptions then fall silent for many years until the mid-13th century when they become more "nationalistic" (for lack of a better word) and completely ignore the earlier Cham allies of Jayavarman.
But, I digress. We should definitely try to nail down his birth year/age. In the meantime, I will try to compile my sources and see if I can find time to work on the article.--William Thweatt TalkContribs 09:06, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks a lot for this comprehensive info. You obviously have done a great deal of research. Hence I suggest you review and rewrite the whole article.
ATB Wikirictor (talk) 01:06, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2013?

[edit]

Last sentence in section Chronology goes: "In 2013 Champa finally became a Khmer province.[7]:78–80"
Wikirictor (talk) 14:26, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That was added with this edit a while back. It is obviously incorrect. As can be seen in the diff, the cited reference originally belonged to the previous sentence.--William Thweatt TalkContribs 23:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jayavarman VII. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jayavarman VII. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jayavarman_VII&oldid=1247977796"