User talk:Zannah

Welcome

Welcome aboard! It's always good to have another British Columbian hard at work here. Welsh castles are as good a subject to write about as any other. If you want a change, and go on to another subject there will be plenty to choose from when you're ready. It's important to keep it fun. ☮ Eclecticology 07:45 Apr 16, 2003 (UTC)

A belated welcome, and kudos on your contributions concerning Florence and Italian Renaissance art! -- Infrogmation 01:28 Apr 27, 2003 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm slowly working through Vasari's Lives, filling in the blanks. - Zannah

Thank you kindly for Rosemary Brown and Ed Broadbent! - Montréalais

Glad you're happy with the Marriage Act editing. All part of the basic service here at the Wiki<G>. -- Someone else 21:05 1 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Hi Zannah. I see we joined the wikipedia at approx. the same time. A minor nit. You created a new stub for Finlandia vodka, when I had (~~probably~~ definitely misguidedly) already included some cursory info on the Finlandia disambiguation page. As I can't cut and paste because of hardware and software problems at this end, can you do something about the problem? Preferrably :-D not just zapping the content. -- Cimon Avaro on a pogo stick 11:40 22 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Hah Hah!! frustration is not the word. Try "absolute mindboglingly discombobulatingly googolplexi-enumeratingly cursing not-funny". -- Cimon Avaro on a pogo stick 04:35 23 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Hi. Please leave the links to Vancouver, British Columbia open. How do we know the people you're writing about weren't mayors of Vancouver, Washington? RickK 01:08, 10 Aug 2003 (UTC)

All fixed. Apologies for the Canada-centric links - I completely forgot about Vancouver, Washington. I'll just blame it on being one of those days. Zannah 02:10, 10 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Hi. It's great to find another fan of the Johnson Johnson series. I admit I haven't read them all - they're very difficult to come by these days. Deb 09:51, 17 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Hi. you may (or may not) be interested to know that I've kicked of a Wikiproject page at Wikipedia:WikiProject Peerage, so discussion can be lumped together in one place :) Mintguy 10:37, 22 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Well, I'm glad Zannah is filling in some italian Renaissance painters too... User:Wetman (August 28, 2003)

What a surprise: another Wikipedian working hard to fill in much-needed gaps about the Pulp and paper industry, but would rather be writing about Welsh castles . . . while I find myself adding details about this industry, while adding information about a certain Welsh personage. My thanks for your contributions! -- llywrch 00:02, 11 Nov 2003 (UTC)

You seem to have created a large number of pages in which you confused Armenia with the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia in what's now southern Turkey. The Kingdom of Cilicia was populated by Armenians and ruled by a branch of the Armenian royal dynasty, but it was independent and was not part of Armenia. I've corrected a number of them, but I just discovered more and I need to get going. If you have time, could you please fix the rest? Just check the edit history of Mleh of Armenia to see what I did. Incidentally, we might also want to move the pages to less ambiguous titles (Mleh of Cilicia instead of Mleh of Armenia for example.) Thanks, Isomorphic 00:43, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I just created Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia. If you're feeling really bored or ambitious you could run through and make appropriate links to that (I wish I'd done that to start with.) Otherwise, don't worry about it, I'll get around to it. By the way, do you know if those monarchs called themselves "King of Armenia"? The truth is that I don't know very much about Cilicia. It seems likely that they considered themselves successors to the Armenian state, and may have taken that title. Isomorphic 19:44, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Oh, and thanks for finishing the corrections earier. Isomorphic 19:45, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

International Gothic

Hello Zannah, I've an a reference on International Gothic as created by Flemish painters in france as opposed to "Burgundy, Bohemia and northern Italy" The link below is my only source for this information so I can't be sure.

 http://www.bartleby.com/65/go/Gothicar.html (paragraph 17)

Sean3000 23:20, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

January 15 Seattle meetup

Just wanted to let you know we are planning another Seattle meetup on January 15, 2005. We're trying to get a sense of who will attend, so please drop by that page & leave a note. -- Jmabel | Talk 07:10, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)

Wikimania 2006

In the course of informal discussions at Wikimania in Frankfurt the possibility of having Wikimania 2006 in Vancouver was raised. What makes Canada desirable for such a meeting is the capacity to draw delegates from the United States. For many overseas delegates, however, U.S. visa requirements make that country less attractive. All else being equal, Europeans see Vancouver as a more interesting Canadian city to visit than Toronto, the only other Canadian city to receive significant consideration.

Preliminary bids from various cities need to be made by Sept. 30, 2005. A short list will be drawn from those bids. Is there enough interest and energy to put together such a conference in Vancouver for August 2006? The people in Frankfurt put on a tremendous gathering, with a core organizational group of about a dozen people. Some 400 people attended from 52 different countries.

I expect that a North American Wikimania could be a little smaller, but we would still need a suitable facility. It would be good to know that such a facility is available for a conference; the type of youth hostel facility that was used in Frankfurt does not exist in North America. What would be the cost of hosting such a conference at UBC?

I'm looking for interest and commitment. To that end I am proposing a Vancouver meetup for Saturday, Sept. 24. If someone has a reasonably accesible place for such a meeting please let me know. (I live in Richmond, but something in the city of Vancouver would be more appropriate.)

I am spammiong this to all Vancouver area Wikipedians that I can find. Please reply to my talk page. Eclecticology 21:50:16, 2005-09-03 (UTC)

User Categorization

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Canada page as living in or being associated with Canada. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians of British Columbia for instructions. --Doviende 21:02, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Canada

Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 17:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saints Wikiproject

I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints.

You are invited to participate in Saints WikiProject, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about saints. We are currently discussing prospects for the project. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

I also invite you to join the discussion on prayers and infoboxes here: Prayers_are_NPOV.

Thanks! --evrik 17:18, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Harlech castle

Nice work. I see you're a Canuck... ever visited Harlech? --Dweller 08:35, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've visited there many a-time; my dad's from Harlech. Zannah 23:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Stewart

Glad to see that you read Go Fug Yourself [1]! Susan Gleason (talk) 17:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Chukwu octuplets

I have nominated Chukwu octuplets, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chukwu octuplets (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Doc^g 16:39, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Zannah! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 713 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Bill Vander Zalm - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Brian Nash - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Keyla Ohs - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chalet School

The article Chalet School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional school. Information concerning the series of novels should be in a separate article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Claritas § 11:38, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Malory Towers

I have nominated Malory Towers, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malory Towers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Claritas § 15:38, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hugh I of Cyprus

The article Hugh I of Cyprus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article retains a Unreferenced template from 2009. No improvement has been made in at least 2 years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hasteur (talk) 20:36, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laura Lopes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laura Lopes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Lopes (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 17:02, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chukwu octuplets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chukwu octuplets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chukwu octuplets (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. User:Namiba 16:32, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn Michaels Good Article Reassessment

Shawn Michaels, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Whiteguru (talk) 12:26, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Rice Award

		Anne Rice Award
		The Anne Rice Award honors editors who have improved Wikipedia's coverage of women writers by creating a biography of a women writer who used a pen name, nom de plume, literary initials, or pseudonym on the title page or by-line of their works in place of their real name. On behalf of WP:WPWW, thank you for creating the biography on Carolyn Gold Heilbrun, who wrote as Amanda Cross. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Breaker High

The article Breaker High has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2009. Could only find press releases, TV Guide listings, passing name-drops in articles about Ryan Gosling, and "star of Breaker High to do X" human-interest stories. No reviews or other significant coverage at all

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:48, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Breaker High for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Breaker High is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breaker High until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laura Lopes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laura Lopes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Lopes (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Edmund Andros

Edmund Andros has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:23, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Diane Lane

Diane Lane has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]