User talk:Jhartmann

Formal Notice

I have reported you and your actions to the Administrator's noticeboard. This is a formal notice. Here is the thread if you wish to contribute in an appropriate and civilized manner: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Reporting_disruptive_user --DiegoAma (talk) 10:41, 13 September 2018

That didn't end as you thought, did it? --Jhartmann (talk) 07:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Just a head's up; don't want to start a problem

If we keep on reversing each other's edits, an edit war would surely occur. I don't want this to happen. You keep on deleting my edits because you presume me to be a Leninist and to be pushing an agenda. While I can assure you that this is not the case, it's entirely irrelevant. You using google to connect me to some random internet user is also silly, as it's one of the most common images found on google when searching for an "anarcho-communist symbol", but, again, that's irrelevant. Your removing of content from a page based on your political opinion is unprofessional. If you feel that the image does not belong for a reason other than me being a "Leninist", that's fine. I won't re-add the image if we can come to an agreement, but I hold the belief that it is relevant to the pages. --DiegoAma (talk) 12:36, 11 September 2018

The rise of Leninism made anarchists, including millions of andarcho-communists, completely stop using the red flag. They'd never in their life use Leninist symbols, which the hammer and sickle clearly is, and you know this. You're not interested in Anarcho-Communism at all, you're a “left unity” lunatic much more close to Maoism than to any brand of anarchism. Just fuck off, dude. --Jhartmann (talk) 06:38, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

The circle-A itself was created by anarcho-communists, in stark distancing from Leninists who killed Anarcho-Communists in large numbers, both in Ukraine and Catalonia/Spain. --Jhartmann (talk) 06:45, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

The hammer and sickle is a symbol used by all leftists. And don't pretend to know what my political ideology is just because I contribute to a Wikipedia page, becausethey're unrelated. I already said that I'm not a Leninist, but that's irrelevant, and now you call me a lunatic? Your name-calling and you telling me to "fuck off" clearly proves that you are too immature to have a rational discussion or even contribute to Wikipedia in a non-biased manner. I will be reporting you to stop further vandalism. --DiegoAma (talk) 10:17, 13 September 2018

AIMstor CDP

AIMstor does provide a CDP solution not a near-CDP solution. Near CDP products are the likes of Microsoft DPM which collects data realtime at the source but only sends the journals every 15mins+. AIMstor captures the data realtime and sends the data realtime. Should the source machine go down, the AIMstor repository has the latest image (subject to whatever was on the wire) in its repository. It has incredibly high number of recovery points although can be throttled down to less. Similar in some ways to XOsoft (now ArcServe) , AIMstor also the capabilty of creating realtime fully consistent recovery points of applications.

"Near CDP ... collects data realtime at the source but only sends the journals every 15mins+."

Nope. CDP offers recovery point objective of zero, and needs no snapshots. Anything between 15min an zero is still Near-CDP. --Jhartmann (talk) 15:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Think we are saying the same thing. I was stating what it isnt, you were stating what it is. SNIA own definition is:

1 Data changes are continuously captured or tracked 2 All data changes are stored in a separate location from the primary storage 3 Recovery point objectives are arbitrary and need not be defined in advance of the actual recovery

CDP term got used and abused by vendors who didn’t remotely even conform to point 1. Microsoft calling a product that transfers its data every 15 minutes and does a snapshot every hour isnt CDP in anyone’s books. Veeam which calls itself near-CDP again is an example of a product that doesn’t continuously transfer. These are products that schedule a resync.

So it comes down to whether you stick to the altruistic interpretation of "arbitrary" on point 3. I’ve seen no products that actually give you to the exact byte I want to roll back too (correct me please if you know different). Simply because it’s meaningless to the user. Ultimately the user is given a recovery time of seconds or a point at which the application is known to be consistent.

Fabkins (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:54, 7 June 2011 (UTC).

heading

Hi,

Talk:Red Panda has links to several Chinese web pages where 火狐 is used to refer to the Red Panda. The official names for both the Red Panda and the Red Fox are different, but I think those examples make clear that 火狐 is used for both animals. If you think otherwise, please elaborate.

Also for all I can tell, the Latin name "vulpes flavus" would be translated as "brown" or "yellow fox". The Latin word for fire is "ignis".

--Fuzzy Logic 22:53, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I don't believe I can block anyone. LaszloWalrus 20:11, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Proxies

Au contraire. Proxies that are used for the purposes of evading blocks can and should be blocked. Nandesuka 21:11, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Telelogic Synergy

An article that you have been involved in editing, Telelogic Synergy, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telelogic Synergy. Thank you. Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:41, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rock Web Server

A tag has been placed on Rock Web Server, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 02:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Microsoft Tablet PC. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. TYelliot (talk) 18:07, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

I did not blank anything, I redirected to an existing article's section on exactly the same topic. --Jhartmann (talk) 18:15, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Microsoft Tablet PC, you may be blocked from editing. The content is not redundant. If you think that it should be redirected, nominate it to AfD and recommend redirection. Terrillja _talk 18:18, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

You're so boring. --Jhartmann (talk) 18:40, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Please file an AfD request if you want to delete Microsoft Tablet PC. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 18:20, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Renamed it, although I don't know why you did not just add content to Tablet PC#Microsoft. --Jhartmann (talk) 18:40, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you move a page maliciously, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Terrillja _talk 18:41, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Other way round: coercion based on no argument at all is a good reason to be blocked. And better first read articles you link to (WP:AT). --Jhartmann (talk) 19:29, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

If you want to move the article please file a move request per WP:RM. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 18:44, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Even you as the creator of the article asked me how to rename it because "Microsoft Tablet PC" is just wrong. Renaming in wikipedia means moving. So why not just doing it? By the way: WP:RM is for "unregistered users and users not yet confirmed". --Jhartmann (talk) 18:55, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

No, it isn't.--Terrillja _talk 20:04, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

I placed a comment on the talk page of User:Terrillja in the section between the two of you which was immediately removed. You might want to read it. __meco (talk) 14:21, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Oh, get off it. Jhartmann didn't like that a page existed, tried to deleted it by invalid CSD, didn't get their way, then tried to redirect it twice, didn't get that, then tried to move it in what was clearly a controversial move. If you bothered to actually look at the contribs you would know that instead of firing off remarks about how you don't even need to look at the history of what happened.--Terrillja _talk 14:34, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

No, you lighten up. It's completely irrelevant to my issue with you whether you or Jhartmann are right about the facts. You have an extremely belligerent manner in which you enter into disputes with other editors. You show not an iota of civility, but start off right from the bat hurling threats and display utter condescension towards the people with whom you disagree. You create personal animosity where before there was mere differences of opinion. __meco (talk) 15:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

February 2011

Please do not add information without verifying it properly and without adding sources. You are also requested to refrain from starting edit wars. Your edits go in violation of WP:V, WP:CITE, WP:CON and WP:EW. Use the talk page if you disagree, I myself already started it. Until then please do not keep edit warring otherwise you are in danger of getting blocked. Thank you, Shahid • ^Talk2me 16:10, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Likasoft Archivarius 3000

The article Likasoft Archivarius 3000 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable software.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 13:04, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2015

Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Osama Abdul Mohsen— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Non-Dropframe _talk 23:44, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Osama Abdul Mohsen with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Non-Dropframe _talk 23:44, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

"Defamation kills!"

"Defamation kills!" you say in your edit to the page of the Arab man that was supposedly tripped by an Hungarian woman. Or did she? Would you please have a close look on the videos and photos linked on that article? Did she really trip the man? Or did he fall while running away? That woman was not quite killed, but fired and blamed. --185.17.206.101 (talk) 02:46, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Osama Abdul Mohsen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Osama Abdul Mohsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osama Abdul Mohsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. clpo13_(talk) 06:14, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jhartmann. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jhartmann. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)