Talk:Mega Man Anniversary Collection

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Sales

Mega Man Anniversary Collection did not sell well, especially on the Nintendo GameCube because newer or mainstream gamers reject direct ports of ancient video games on modern consoles. They are typically find it difficult to grasp at long-dated graphics on modern consoles. I am personally opposed to direct ports of ancient video games on modern home television game consoles. Tedius Zanarukando 21 Mar 2005 22:53 (EST)

Dude, that sounds more like POV if you ask me. I mean, why would gamers NOT want collections of older games on modern consoles? - Nintendo Maximus

It DID sell well, the up-coming release of the Mega Man X Collection being a direct result of it. I'm just pissed they didn't bring it to Europe.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.248.118.81 (talk • contribs) 21:29, October 16, 2005.

Especially on GameCube? That's pure BS right there, since the GC version earned the Player's Choice lable. And the release of MMXC on BOTH the PS2 and GC is more proof this collection sold well on BOTH systems.-Mega Man 5 December 18, 2006

I like older games on newer consoles. You get to experience classic games on a console that most people have. I mean, you can't find a SNES in stores, you know. - Tenguman

Neutrality

The section "Controversy and differences" is a pov issue. The name is implying that any difference is a controversy. There are also a total lack of sources in that part of the article. If none are forthcoming, I'll rename the section and reformat it to comply with WP:NPOV and WP:OR.--Crossmr 03:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article is very biased and contains the author's opinion, which is something not often seen on Wikipedia either. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.79.90.219 (talk) 17:25, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite.

Looking at this article, I think a complete rewrite is in order. There are all sorts of presentation errors throughout the article, such as unnecessary Bold Text. Numerous points about the compilations are missing completely, and there aren't enough cites, as the warning suggests.

I'm going to see what I can do between other projects, and, to anyone interested, help would be appreciated. As a huge Mega Man fan, I think this article deserves more attention. - EliotAndrews (talk) 05:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rockman Complete Works

This should NOT redirect to here. They were two separate compilations!! - Snip3rNife (talk) 16:08, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the discussion was the merge it because the Rockman Complete Works article contained almost nothing that the Anniversary Collection article already does. Articles for the first six games also mention their PS release dates and content. Complete Works was released only in Japan, Anniversary Collection was released only in North America, and this is the English Wikipedia. If you revert the merge, the article will need to be expanded, reliably referenced to stand on its own, and the subject will need to achieve notability in the eyes of the WP:VG project. ~ Hibana (talk) 17:42, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, but this page was never modified to include info on RMCW, so unless they're properly merged it's pointless. In my eyes, they're still two different compilations though. - Snip3rNife (talk) 16:40, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mega Man Anniversary Collection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611235546/http://www.gamesarefun.com/news.php?newsid=5326 to http://www.gamesarefun.com/news.php?newsid=5326

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]