Jump to content

Talk:Marlin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Recreational fishing for Marlin is mainly a catch and release program, recognizing the Marlin as a renuable source of revenue for the species.

Sailfish nominated for SCOTW

[edit]

I've just nominated the sailfish article as Science Collaboration of the Week. Please visit Wikipedia:Science collaboration of the week and vote for the article. Thanks. - Samsara contrib talk 08:18, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marlin Sizes

[edit]

One of the largest fish in the world and is the largest of the atlantic marlins. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.182.182.143 (talk) 21:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The largest officially recorded Blue Marlin was 1,803 pounds or 820 kilograms in weight, and there are reasonably reliable accounts of long-lined specimens exceeding this size.

Similarly, the largest officially recorded Black Marlin was around 1,470 or 670 kilograms in weight, and again their are reasonably reliable accounts of speciments exceeding this size.

Both are two of the largest boney fish species.

Codman 09:24, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An article at CNN [1] mentions a marlin that is 4.3 meters long. This article says that they only reach 2.5 meters long. . .can someone verify if CNN is wrong or if this article needs to be updated? Dfuss 17:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The second paragraph of this article does mention two species of marlin that reach lengths of up to 5.0 meters. A bit of a contradiction of the first paragraph that mentions 2.5 meters. Perhaps that was supposed to refer to the average size? It should be clarified. Neil916 18:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have the answer, but the 2.5 m in the first para is body length - this still doesn't account for the difference though! GrahamBould 10:27, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an interesting table on the subject. The 1,805 lb (819 kg) specimen is the largest well-documented (measured – not estimated – weight, date, location, photo) marlin I've yet seen. Note that the third-largest of the table is assigned with a length of 19 ft 7 in (5.97 m). The Indo-Pacific Blue Marlin Makaira mazara appears to be the largest species – in fact, the largest in the order Perciformes – though the Black Marlin has the greatest IGFA record of all marlins at 1,560 lb (708 kg). I've seen greater apparently accurate weights, however, they've been somewhat obscure; no date or location for example. And estimates upward to 3,000 lb (1,361 kg) can only be regarded as unrealistic compared to existing data. Of bony fish, three species of the Molidae family and the Beluga sturgeon grow larger than marlins. --Anshelm '77 00:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Location

[edit]

Could someone please tell me what seas Marlin are found in, as they are not found in "all seas" as the article states. Thanks, Fezz.

Removed material from blue marlin

[edit]

Just removed this crud from the blue marlin disambiguation page:

Marlins are typically species (belonging in the Istiophoridae family) of a large, long nosed, carnivorous fish, that are related to the swordfish and sailfish. Marlins consumes other fish and are highly prized by sportsmen.

In case anyone finds it useful...

Samsara (talk • contribs) 21:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Snout

[edit]

Should there be a section on the use of the snout? (anon)

Yep ... why do Marlins have the spear? One might think of uses but better to know for sure ... MrG 4.225.213.210 15:43, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Oldmansea petrov.jpg

[edit]

Image:Oldmansea petrov.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed this image from the article, as no Fair Use rationale was given, and it seems that no possible fair use could be claimed for this article. --Storkk (talk) 17:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops... there was a Rationale on the image page, I must be blind. --Storkk (talk) 17:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have asked for a Fair Use review, and tagged the image as such. Sorry for the confusion. --Storkk (talk) 17:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction?

[edit]

I don't know the precise terminology, but these two sentences from the article seem to be in contradiction:

  • They are popular sporting fish in certain tropical areas and are also commercially important as a food fish.
  • Marlin are rarely table fare.

Could this be cleared up? If it's not a contradiction, then the terms used need to be better defined. Thanks, Storkk (talk) 17:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell? I agree that it does not make any sense. As far as I know, Marlin are not commercially important and are mainly game fish. I am editing the article to reflect that, and if anyone thinks otherwise, the burden of source is on you. 24.196.146.119 (talk) 06:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not so sure. I do know Asda in the UK sell marlin steaks on its fresh fish counter at ~£17.50 per kilo. And if ASDA (owned by wal-mart) sell marlin other places must as well. It's not exactly renowned for stocking rare delicacies. 02:38, 24 December 2008 (UTC)92.3.145.90 (talk) 02:38, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Marlin are rarely table fare, appearing mostly in fine restaurants." This might be BS… I had marlin like 20 or 30 times in the last few years buying in small fish stores of a small inland city (mostly prepared as ceviche). Maybe it wasn't marlin after all, but the use of the name at least tells that its food use is more than anecdotical. Only point I agree with: it's a fine dish :-) 201.246.95.56 (talk) 06:24, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I know wiikipedia discourages popular culture references, but I think it is quite important to make a reference to the film "The Book of Daniel Taylor" in which a large talking marlin that only daniel can see tells what to do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bradley10 (talk • contribs) 16:17, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shane

[edit]

Billfish says that shane belongs in this family. Can anyone deny or clarify? --Ettrig (talk) 16:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speed

[edit]

There told: Even more so than their close relatives the scombrids, marlin are incredibly fast swimmers, reaching speeds of about 110 kilometres per hour (68 mph). But in article 3 (http://www.thetravelalmanac.com/lists/fish-speed.htm), as you can see, Sailfish 110 kph - 68 mph, and marlin only 80 kph and 50 mph. Think it should be corrected. Sorry for my English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.106.33.2 (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marlin's speed

[edit]

The real marlin's speed is 59 km/h The 110 kilometer per hours was estimated in 1920 by biologists. It's not a real measure. Can i edit the article ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Idiot.crow (talk • contribs) 17:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:47, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

All modern scientific papers agrees on one thing about fish speeds : it is NOT superior 100kph (and probably not superior to 80kph as this article state either). Yet regularly reappears absurd claims, the current record holder being a 105kph speed found here : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_marlin I can't spend a day finding references for each species' speed because paper mainly focus on 2 or 3 of them (spearfish, blue marlin and sailfish). Direct speed record never showed the crazy speeds announced by these articles. These speeds are the result of either very old (century) research or approximations (such as length of fishing line pulled during a given time). They are likely physically impossible. Here are a few source among many disproving such speeds : https://jeb.biologists.org/content/jexbio/166/1/267.full.pdf http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20161025-the-one-thing-everyone-knows-about-swordfish-is-wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:CB08:8E38:7000:B92A:CF1A:69C:48D9 (talk) 16:14, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are white marlin endangered?

[edit]

"They are popular sporting fish in tropical areas. The Atlantic blue marlin and the white marlin are endangered owing to overfishing." 203.30.4.225 (talk) 12:28, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Marlin&oldid=1194057318"