Talk:Endovelicus

Portugal Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Serious editing

All of these articles on Lusitanian deities are in need of serious editing. Unfortunately, I have no resources available regarding the mythology of the Lusitanians and thus am not able to do more than correct some of the spelling and grammar. Please feel free to expand this article in any way you can. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.113.86.77 (talk) 20:48, 21 April 2005‎

404s

None of the external links is currently working. How are we supposed to deal with this? --Xyzt1234 (talk) 22:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What Olivares says

Here’s all that Olivares of the University of Alicante has to say in his article on the god at http://www4.uwm.edu/celtic/ekeltoi/volumes/vol6/6_12/olivares_6_12.html:

"The first thing that is seen from his inscriptions is the relationship of the god with the private or family environment. Of the 51 inscriptions to the god that have a named dedicator, 17 were by women, some 33% of the dedications. This is a very high proportion, much higher than for the rest of the Hispanic deities (excluding Arentius and therefore Vaelicus) and is similar to the data that we have for the dedications to the indigenous gods Apollo and Mercury in the rest of western Europe. The oracular and healing character of Endouellicus, and his association with the individual and the family are, in our opinion, the most outstanding features of the inscriptions, and they profile a divine typology comparable to that which we have for Lugus or Arentius, which is not contradicted by the location of the sanctuary of this god on a small hill."

Quite whence all the 'information' about 'Lucifer' in reference to this theonym comes in the temples and cults section, I'd love to know! The Spanish and Portuguese versions of this Wikipedia article are not nearly as lengthy. Clearly more must have been written in English about this god than in the languages of the countries of the Iberian peninsula where he was once worshipped!!!

G.M.Gladehall (talk) 12:51, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Self art

I am deleting the depiction of Endovelicus. Self art should be treated as self-investigation: original material, not relevant. Voj 2005 (talk) 11:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted link

The link to the Paleohispánica magazine was deleted because it doesn't hold anything relatable to Endovelicus or the Lusitanian gods (but to Tartessic ones, at best): https://ifc.dpz.es/recursos/publicaciones/21/92/_ebook.pdf Voj 2005 (talk) 14:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]