Talk:Blackgang Chine

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Amusement Parks Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Isle of Wight Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Isle of Wight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of the Isle of Wight in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Isle of WightWikipedia:WikiProject Isle of WightTemplate:WikiProject Isle of WightIsle of Wight-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This place keeps on falling into the sea, so the park owner has to keep moving the rides back every couple of years.

Indeed. Also: I love it. Childhood nostalgia thing. I was the sad git who wrote the entire park guide, bar one sentence. Makron1n 23:19, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Park guide

As part of some work I have been doing to try and improve this article I was thinking about changing the park guide section to a table, with possible column headers as "Ride", "Date Opened", "Description", "Image" and possibly others if anyone else has any other ideas. So what does everyone think of this? Agree/Disagree? Feel free to comment as ever! Editor5807^speak 23:59, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? Sounds like a sensible idea. Naturenet | Talk 08:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessment

Although admittedly I have added quite a lot of the content to this page, I feel it has improved a lot since I first started and is now definitely up to C class. As a result, I have changed the project headers to show this. Of course if anyone does disagree with this then feel free to change it, as I was the main contributer, it may not be objective... In addition, if there are any other ideas for improvement please comment as well! Thanks Editor5807^speak 18:59, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Blackgang Chine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090531105516/http://www.blackgangchine.com:80/attractions.asp to http://www.blackgangchine.com/attractions.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:16, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Blackgang Chine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Too many images

There are far too many images in this largely promotional article. Ehrenkater (talk) 16:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There probably are. But the ongoing record of various rides and features is a useful one, which becomes less promotional and more notable as time goes on. I think this should not be lost. Naturenet | Talk 09:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]