Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ascend
Appearance
Ascend was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete. Cool Hand Luke 02:25, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Seems non-notable, or at least merged with role-playing. - Ta bu shi da yu 15:27, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Lost/widowed VfD. Perhaps mention in role-playing, but do not merge or redirect. Too little there. delete. Cool Hand Luke 07:51, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Never heard of it. Delete. Alphax (talk) 13:38, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)
- Never heard of it either. Delete. Frankchn 13:40, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Not necessarily to do with RPG-ing. Not only is this article content-free, but it's also completely context-free. Because of that, Delete - rernst 14:21, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Either recreation of a speedy deleted article or someone transferred it from the CSD page to here. Neologism/argot of no use to an encyclopedia audience. Geogre 15:20, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)]
- Comment: Pretty much specific to the "roguelike" and "BBS door" families of computer roleplaying games.
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.