User talk:Quadra23

NTFS

The more attention broken stuff here gets, the more likely it is to get fixed. AlistairMcMillan 02:01, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced the COPYVIO page with Scorpiuss new page. AlistairMcMillan 02:11, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PHP

Hi,

I replied in the article's talk page. --Gutza ^{T T+} 07:29, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Clark's powers

I was referring to what the list showed. It shows what his powers are and when they first appeared. It chronicals their first appearance, not each appearance in the show. Heat Vision appeared in "HEAT" first, and that's the only time an episode should be listed. The section lists his powers and their first appearance. I thought that was kind of obvious because there aren't any other episodes listed by the powers except the ones that show the first instance of them. And the reason "DC characters" gets multiple episodes is because they aren't there all the time. Clark always has his powers, and always uses them (minus when something happens and he loses them), but characters that appear in the show are "special" because they don't appear in each episode, nor do they appear beyond a season usually. Anyone that does is usually listed as a regular cast member (i.e. Lana, Pete, Whitney, Lois). I said "pay attention to what it was about" not "pay attention to what was written"; I was saying pay attention to how the section is formatted as it would clue you in that only the first appearance was listed. I'm also sorry if it came off as rude, I was merely trying to quickly explain it in the summary edit why I reverted it. Bignole 23:11, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Listing everyone episode for each of the powers would become seriously overdone. You have to remember there are currently 113 episodes. The fact that he used a chain reaction with a power doesn't change what the section is about. It's merely there to show what powers he has developed in the show so far, and when those powers occurred. I thought it was self explanatory where only one episode is listed that it didn't mean he only used them once but that that was were they first appeared. If you think that it causes confusion, then a simple sentence or two explaining that wouldn't be a problem. It's be a little too much to go into detail about how each power was used in each episode. We had that already on the "Clark's Powers in Smallville" page, but we deleted the page on the grounds that it didn't follow Wiki's policy for Notability. Bignole 00:03, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Oliver Queen takes aim.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Oliver Queen takes aim.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 14:58, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Oliver Queen takes aim.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Oliver Queen takes aim.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:46, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RAD Game Tools for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RAD Game Tools is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RAD Game Tools until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cloudbound (talk) 23:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]