Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MelBone

was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Looks like a system or service operated by a now-defunct ISP which itself lacks an article. Notability would have been dubious even when the ISP was in business, certainly more so now. melbone: 219 Google results, most or all unrelated or mispellings. melbone ausbone -wikipedia: 2 Google results. VFD notice was added on 1 July by User:Poccil, but I don't see evidence of an actual VfD discussion, and I can't imagine the article would have survived VfD looking like it does. —Triskaideka 19:43, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)

• Delete: Melbourne backbone, eh? No evidence of notability. Geogre 19:59, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable defunct mass of wires. — Gwalla | Talk 20:46, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• MelBone should redirect to AusBone, which I believe is (or was, as it is defunct) notable enough for a WP article; however WP lacks an article on it. Unfortunately I don't know much about it at all. Move and redirect to AusBone as a stub? BTW, for the user asing what an IX is, see Internet Exchange Point. -- Chuq 00:07, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, and don't create a stub elsewhere to redirect to. I don't think either are notable. Ambi 08:34, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.