User talk:Anthony Dean

Since it's your IP that's blocked, you can either email the blocking admin, or post your IP here.--Shanel ^§ 22:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My IP address: 69.210.158.60. (It's not a static IP address, though---I'm an at-home DSL user). I've also emailed Curps per the instructions on the block page, for extra assurance. Anthony Dean 00:05, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Anthony Dean, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Infrogmation 03:54, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

What he said. :) Nice to see more Utnish types around here. - jredmond 16:50, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. Though so far, not sure how useful my entries are (mostly been correcting mistakes or writing whole entries on cartoon characters, such as Wilma Flintstone or Rocky the Flying Squirrel...).

Every little bit helps. Besides, you could always think of those edits as warm-ups to bigger stuff. (Also, for the record, if you put four tildes at the end of your talk-page comments, it'll sign your name. You can customize that in your prefs, if you want.) - jredmond 17:32, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thanks! Soon as I think of something more important to post on, we'll see what comes up; for now, probably just making use of my treasure-trove of trivia knowledge will suffice... :-) Anthony Dean 04:51, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)

Flintstone Age

You wrote: "Deleted year given---the year often anachronistically stated for the Flintstones' "Stone Age" era was "1 million B.C.")". Are you sure? I can't recall ever seeing that, but as I recall it, Pebbles was born 10.000 BC. Aliter 01:01, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

The year given on the various Flintstone series has varied over the years; IIRC, the "official line" from Hanna-Barbera was that Pebbles was born on "February 22, 10000 BC", but such a rather "late" year was never given anywhere in the show itself---one episode of the original series features Barney noting he graduated "20 years ago" as "Class of 1,000,020 BC" (implying it's 1 million BC), and other episodes and spinoffs (particularly the movie "The Jetsons Meet the Flintstones" mentioned Fred and the gang being from "a million years ago" a lot) imply the Flintstones lived in/around 1,000,000 BC. (The actual Stone Age was obviously closer to the "10,000 BC" mark, but then again, dinosaurs weren't alive in 10,000 *or* 1,000,000 BC ;-) ). Granted, this isn't the most consistent show, but by my call, the Bedrock bunch lived "circa 1,000,000 BC"...

The best Flintstones website I've seen online has a bunch of miscellaneous trivia listed [1] and gives the "10,000 BC" birthdate...

Maybe under the entry could be a line like: "Pebbles was born on February 22, 10,000 BC (according to the show's producers; most citations of the actual year during the series' various runs placed the date as circa 1,000,000 BC)"? Anthony Dean 01:58, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)

Los Angeles ?

Maybe not literally the L.A. suburbs... but as a child in Chicago's suburbs when this show began, there is no question in my mind that the Flintstones represented what people call "White Suburbia"... in contrast to "The Honeymooners", on which it is patterned, and which was set in the inner city, in the time before many of the white city folks fled to the suburbs. That casts a sober note on the Flintstones, I realize. However, that might also be reading a little too much into a cartoon. :) Wahkeenah 01:19, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, everything on TV in the early-to-mid 60's (when the show first aired) reflected the segregated society of its time, though like TV after the mid-60's, subsequent Flintstones spinoffs presented a more integrated society for the car-driving cavepeople of Bedrock. As an African-American kid watching the originals in reruns, though, I still thought it was funny, along with the Honeymooners (though I don't recall the Honeymooners showing a very integrated Brooklyn, either...). Anthony Dean 03:09, May 15, 2005 (UTC)

Donald Duck

Good edits! Thanks! --Janke | Talk 10:30, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Superman

Great work on this page, nice to have a fresh perspective - Dyslexic agnostic 17:18, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Mostly trying to make sure there's a neutral POV to this stuff, as well as ensuring that there's at least some info on Superman's (and the other superhero pages I've been editing) Golden and Silver Age histories, not just whatever's in current continuity (such as *that* is these days...). Anthony Dean 01:02, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

POV only goes one way -- to the LEFT

Anthony Dean:

Why do you keep cleaning up the record of this disgusting little creep Michelangelo Signorile? The man is the homosexual and intellectual equivalent of Russell Henderson and Aaron McKinney. I know of someone that killed himself because the local paper outed him. Now I don’t suppose outing should be against the law exactly but this person should at least have to live with the reputation he has earned for himself. Not all in the gay community approve the politics of personal destruction. I certainly don't. We all have the right to privacy. Even conservative closet cases like I used to be.

This bully did invent the practice after all. You should not call your self neutral while cleaning up all the droppings of "leaders" you seem to favor. You are his advocate and defender. You will not allow anything critical about him to stay up for very long.

I am afraid this Wikipedia experiment is a failure. There is too much re-writing of history for this website to have much practical value. Mccommas 02:07, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the reference not out of personal political biases, but because the Coulter article you linked to said nothing about Signorile, just discussing outing in general, for which the outing page is the most appropriate topic. Plus, Wikipedia's NPOV is there to prevent postings from people with particular axes to grind---that's what weblogs/personal websites are for. Anthony Dean 03:00, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You always edit out all material that is negative to the liberal and call it POV. POV is a one way ratchet. You can go one way but not the other. No balance. That’s it. I quit. I am going to go live in the real world now. This website is useless, a complete failure.John R. McCommas

Um, yeah. Well, there's always the non-politically-related Wikipedia pages one can peruse/edit instead... :-) cuntAnthony Dean 03:37, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Awards

You have a point regarding your apparent objection to inclusion of all of the CBG Awards. I note that in several places you have deleted references to some pieces which did not receive what you seem to think of as a sufficiently high percentage of the vote or a sufficiently high place in the final totals. Please note that in most cases they didn't even mention those "contenders" who finished with only one or two votes, which probably number in the hundreds. Simply so that we don't continue to bump up against each other, I request some clarification as to what you would consider to be sufficient percentage of the vote or ranking in the vote so that you will not eliminate them later. Also, if you can think of a better phrase than "top votegetter" for these awards, which do not technically HAVE nominations, please let me know and I will change the phrase accordingly.Badbilltucker 16:28, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My criteria was that only award winners should be listed, not nominees; as I stated elsewhere, this isn't the Oscars---in this case, "just being nominated" for a fan-based award (of which there's a zillion such awards) isn't particularly special. Also should state that your link to an awards page is off-topic on most of your pages; simply wikifing the name of the award (and listing the external link on the award's page) is sufficient enough. Anthony Dean 01:39, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Guardian quote removal at Batman

Hi. You removed the following text I added to Batman, stating it wasn't NPOV. Could you clarify what you mean. "with The Guardian lauding him as "the perfect cultural artefact for the 21st century." [2]"

The quote itself is verifiable and from a reliable source, so I'm unsure where your problem lies with its inclusion. WP:NPOV itself states An encyclopedic article should not argue that corporations are criminals, even if the author believes it to be so. It should instead present the fact that some people believe it, and what their reasons are, and then as well it should present what the other side says.

It also says: Where we might want to state an opinion, we convert that opinion into a fact by attributing the opinion to someone. So, rather than asserting, "The Beatles were the greatest band", we can say, "Most Americans believe that the Beatles were the greatest band of the Sixties," which is a fact verifiable by survey results, or "The Beatles had more Billboard #1 hits than any other rock band," which is also a fact. In the first instance we assert an opinion; in the second and third instances we "convert" that opinion into fact by attributing it to someone.

It then goes on to say: Disagreements over whether something is approached the Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) way can usually be avoided through the practice of good research. Facts (as defined in the previous paragraph) are not Points Of View (POV, here used in the meaning of "opposite of NPOV") in and of themselves. A good way to help building a neutral point of view is to find a reputable source for the piece of information you want to add to wikipedia, and then cite that source.

The quote is clearly labelled as being a quote rather than the opinion of the article, and therefore is a fact, since The Guardian published the quote. I believe I have fulfilled the guidance in finding a source for the statement and citing it. The reason I added it was to add credibility to the preceeding sentence, which reads one of the world's most well-known comic-book characters, and technically is point of view since the article is asserting the statement rather than sourcing it. I'd appreciate a clarification of your thinking, ta, Steve block talk 20:30, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The quote had sounded a bit like an opinion to me (since not everyone might agree on such), though moreso, it sounded like an oddly phrased way to praise the character's greatness/cite how he's a well-known comic character ("perfect cultural artefact"?), vs. quoting sales figures or something. Still, guess the quote could be put back in---though maybe as a footnote link, with the quote at the bottom of the page? Anthony Dean 01:37, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have to say I still can't understand your reasoning. Steve block talk 12:09, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lois Lane

hey, i know you want to change the Lois Lane pic too, but DrBat keeps putting his back just because he's the one who uploaded it. if we find one we both like we can overule him, eh?

Actually, I had considered just putting his picture back on the top of the page originally (even though I think that depiction of Lois looks ugly, frankly---mostly for the tacky 80's clothes she's wearing), but opted to upload a different one altogether. Would just settle for either his image or one that looks as neutral but with less tacky clothes and *doesn't* involve Lois' clothes being ripped to shreds (like the "For Tomorrow" photo someone posted) or falling off a building with her legs/part of her rear end exposed---such as the "10 Cent Adventure" picture I posted for instance. BTW, you can sign your name by putting 4 "~" symbols at the end of your sentence above. Anthony Dean 13:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yeah i just want ANYTHING but the tacky eighties byrne one. or at least a byrne one that doesn't look ridiculously dated. i mean even the alex ross painting of when lois meets supes in Action #1. i was thinking something by ed benes where she is just wearing a business suit. or how she looked in infinite crisis #2 - Exvicious 18:04, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Guess a business suit-wearing picture one would be fine with me (or something of her in less-dated looking clothes)... Anthony Dean 18:24, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hello. Please remember to always provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy editing. Steve block talk 13:36, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

I don't see you as being blocked (under your username at least) - if you are unable to edit, can you copy paste the block message here and put the unblock back up, its either an autoblocker or your IP address has been blocked. Cheers! -- Tawker 05:22, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The text block shown is: "

Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Curps for the following reason (see our blocking policy): "Contact mailto:abuse@sbcglobal.net, +1-800-648-1626, report: /Apr 16/ 13:00 CDT 68.74.194.79, 12:59 68.74.195.87, 12:57 69.210.118.150, 12:23 68.74.195.57 /Apr 15/ 11:31 CDT 68.74.198.108, 11:27 69.210.119.239, 11:14 68.74.193.60, 11:12 68.74.199.116"

Your IP address is 68.74.195.105." Anthony Dean 06:13, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Upon checking again today, I found a new message: "Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Curps for the following reason (see our blocking policy): "vandalism from this IP range, sorry. Complain to mailto:abuse@sbcglobal.net, 800-648-1626" Your IP address is 75.7.78.91."

As noted previously, believe I've been accidentially blocked. Anthony Dean 23:47, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've unblocked, pls let us know if you have any problems -- Tawker 05:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All seems to be working well now... thanks! Anthony Dean 00:19, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images

hey if you ever need help on image concensus against drbat's manic image changing (to his images), i got your back. --- Exvicious 04:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Action comics 310.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Action comics 310.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Bugsbunny rabbit transit.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bugsbunny rabbit transit.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Porkypigshow.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Porkypigshow.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 08:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Shaggy scooby wnsd2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Shaggy scooby wnsd2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 20:18, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Atomant2.gif

I have tagged Image:Atomant2.gif as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 08:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wilma_and_betty.jpg

I have tagged Image:Wilma_and_betty.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 17:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rm bongo 1972.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Rm bongo 1972.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:02, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hdl_rosa2.jpg

I have tagged Image:Hdl_rosa2.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 18:13, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Terrance phillip.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Terrance phillip.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:36, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Superman museum.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Superman museum.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:15, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Superman v1 141.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Superman v1 141.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sabrinawitch.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sabrinawitch.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 1 != 2 06:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mrsclaus rankinbass.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mrsclaus rankinbass.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 13:50, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bedrock skyline season1 closing.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bedrock skyline season1 closing.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bedrock skyline season1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bedrock skyline season1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Muttley2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Muttley2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jlanimals.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jlanimals.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rocky bullwinkle tracks.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rocky bullwinkle tracks.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Superman 296.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Superman 296.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Superman v1 141.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Superman v1 141.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RocketJSquirrel2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RocketJSquirrel2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fred flintstone.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fred flintstone.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boris natasha fearless.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Boris natasha fearless.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BullwinkleJMoose.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BullwinkleJMoose.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dick muttley.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dick muttley.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dastardly muttley cast.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dastardly muttley cast.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dickdastardly.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dickdastardly.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fastback zoocrew.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fastback zoocrew.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Daphne fred wnsd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Daphne fred wnsd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Daphne velma wnsd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Daphne velma wnsd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pebbles bamm bamm.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Pebbles bamm bamm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Peabody sherman.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Peabody sherman.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pete_ross_teen.jpg

I have tagged Image:Pete_ross_teen.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 03:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Zoocrew issue1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Zoocrew issue1.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 12:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Alleykatabra.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Alleykatabra.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pais (talk) 10:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Anthony Dean! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 710 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Ramona Fradon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Chelseaboys.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Chelseaboys.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Lana and clark 1980.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lana and clark 1980.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 01:36, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Kents silverage elderly.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kents silverage elderly.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 23:26, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:Lori lemaris.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lori lemaris.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:24, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:Littlecheese.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Littlecheese.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Superman v1 141.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Superman v1 141.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Perry white jo22.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Perry white jo22.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:39, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Pigiron zoocrew.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pigiron zoocrew.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:10, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BullwinkleJMoose.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BullwinkleJMoose.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:05, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Babynewyear cartoon.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Babynewyear cartoon.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:05, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Upsidaisium.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Upsidaisium.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:06, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Thismodernworld cast.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Thismodernworld cast.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:00, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Easter bunny drawing.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Easter bunny drawing.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:49, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Superman 296.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Superman 296.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 20:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mister Big (Rocky and Bullwinkle) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mister Big (Rocky and Bullwinkle) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mister Big (Rocky and Bullwinkle) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JDDJS (talk) 20:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Little Cheese

The article Little Cheese has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails to establish any real world notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 12:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yankee Poodle

The article Yankee Poodle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails to establish any real world notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 12:20, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rubberduck

The article Rubberduck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails to establish any real world notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 12:20, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peter Porkchops

The article Peter Porkchops has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails to establish any real world notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 14:01, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fastback (comics)

The article Fastback (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails to establish any real world notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 14:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Little Cheese for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Little Cheese is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Cheese until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 00:13, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yankee Poodle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yankee Poodle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yankee Poodle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 00:14, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rubberduck for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rubberduck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubberduck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 00:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fastback (comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fastback (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fastback (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 00:16, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alleykatabra.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alleykatabra.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yankeepoodle.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yankeepoodle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rubberduck.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rubberduck.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Boris natasha fearless.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Boris natasha fearless.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Boris natasha fearless.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Boris natasha fearless.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Just'a Lotta Animals

The article Just'a Lotta Animals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:12, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Just'a Lotta Animals for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Just'a Lotta Animals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just'a Lotta Animals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:49, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jlanimals.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jlanimals.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Central City (DC Comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Central City (DC Comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central City (DC Comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:32, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]