This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pink Floyd, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pink Floyd on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pink FloydWikipedia:WikiProject Pink FloydTemplate:WikiProject Pink FloydPink Floyd
Re-size large images around to 300 pixels (all "fair use" images), other than album covers (already done).
Articles
Expand all articles to at least Start class. Some song stubs can't be expanded and should be redirected to the relevant album article. Use the "Interstellar Overdrive" article as an example when editing a song stub.
Expand all of the Floyd's studio album articles to at least GA status.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock
@Zmbro: I can probably fix all these, but I am busy pretty much all weekend and I'm struggling to think of a free evening I've got to check my book sources and fix everything up. I do intend to do it at the first possible opportunity, though! Ritchie333(talk)(cont)11:12, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No probs. AFAIK the ones I personally took to GA should be alright, though stuff does occasionally slip through when I'm not keeping an eye on them, plus I've got better at writing and presenting stuff in the last ten years anyway. Ritchie333(talk)(cont)16:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've had a quick look, and there is far more unsourced and unverifiable content than what's just tagged, a bunch of fan sites (which should not be used in a GA; often received wisdom by fans has been contradicted by official sources years later), some sources are not formatted correctly, and there's a general feeling that I probably should have watchlisted this and kept an eye on it. I'll see what else I can do, but if you want to send it to GAR (with the intent of getting wider support), that might not be a bad solution. Ritchie333(talk)(cont)18:50, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]