Talk:Centaurea diffusa

This article needs major wikification, cutting and photos. I'll get to these when I can.

--Jprice 01:21, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The whole page reeks of copy'n'paste copyright violation to me, though I can't find the source. 99% of the text appeared in a single edit by a single contributor. As the whole is also way outside of wiki style I'd suggest getting rid of the lot and starting over. - MPF 23:50, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it will be a lot of work. I'm presently wikifying allelopathy that I suspect was added by the same contributor. However, as the information appears to be very detailed, current, and well documented, I think we would be making a mistake to just delete it - Marshman 03:38, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Old Cleanup Archive

Taken from the old Cleanup entry…Archived by HopeSeekr of xMule (Talk) 15:35, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Diffuse knapweed - seems to have been adapted from a school essay; needs wikification, copy editing, pictures. Quercus 20:04, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Removed warnings

Hi guys,

I removed the warnings on this page, reorganized some paragraphs and did some mild wikification and cleanup (style alteration and added internal links).

Please contact me on my User talk:Splintax if you disagree with these alterations.. thanks!

splintax 14:19, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Centaurea diffusa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:30, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]