Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RACA index of articles
RACA index of articles was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE
From cleanup: RACA index of articles and everything listed there, not notable - SimonP 22:07, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Portal page, qualifies as a speedy as an article that is only a collection of (in this case internal) links. I can't say everything listed in it can be deleted. As laborious as it is, they'll need individual consideration. Geogre 00:51, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I can't find support that its a speedy deleted candidate only because it is a list of links. Please provide that justification before someone goes and does it. -- Netoholic @ 01:22, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- 4: Articles that have no description of what they are. Any article that goes immediately to links is such. I.e. there is no content there, just reference outward. Geogre 14:28, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Nice "interpretation" of the policy, but it actually reads "4. Very short articles with little or no definition or context (e.g., "He is a funny man that has created Factory and the Hacienda. And, by the way, his wife is great."). Turning such pages into relevent redirects may sometimes be appropriate.". List of internal/external links hardly is similar to that example. This article gives its definition "The Royal Automobile Club of Australia (RACA) Index of articles" - its more verbose than many disambig pages. -- Netoholic @ 17:21, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I can't find support that its a speedy deleted candidate only because it is a list of links. Please provide that justification before someone goes and does it. -- Netoholic @ 01:22, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Merge all into one Royal Automobile Club of Australia article. Suggest sending back to cleanup with those instructions, as the group is notable enough for at least one article. Agree though that this looks more like they are duplicating their website ( http://www.raca.com.au/ ) on WP. -- Netoholic @ 01:07, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. This has been on cleanup for >2 months. rhyax 05:42, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 02:42, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.