Talk:Mitsubishi FTO

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mitsubishi FTO article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The name

Some people on forums and such claim that FTO doesn't actually stand for Fresh Touring Origination, but is simply "one less than GTO". This sounds like garbage to me, but can anyone confirm or deny? A friend of mine owns and FTO and I swear I read some japlish-style sales rubbish when he first got it that heavily supported the acronym. --Super Jamie 10:31, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

NZ

I thought the FTO was sold in New Zealand (not as a grey import). Can anyone confirm this? Yes

2001

There are some 2001 FTOs out there, why aren't they in the annual production list? 115.189.158.220 (talk) 05:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are and was 2001 models.Kongkit (talk) 16:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)KongkitKongkit (talk) 16:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Table refers to production, not sales. Source of data is Mitsubishi Motors themselves (eighth page of cited document). --DeLarge (talk) 23:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FTO Production officially ceased in Aug 2000 (Kongkit: Check the VIN plates / seatbelt tags of such '2001' models you refer to) Webcor (talk) 14:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

Someone keeps changing the peak power values in the tables to very low values. Why? Vandalism? eg. the MIVEC version should have 197hp but someone changes it to 90 or 133hp. 63.116.23.136 (talk) 12:18, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mitsubishi FTO GPX Limited Edition.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Mitsubishi FTO GPX Limited Edition.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Mitsubishi FTO GPX Limited Edition.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:31, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Facelift"

A facelift usually refers to an external change applying to the entire range. Since the 1.8 GS did not get the "facelift", I reckon it is incorrect to refer to it as such. I know that FTO owners do it, but still. I think it could still be considered a facelift if the other changes mentioned (five-speed auto, some ABS differences) occurred around the same time. The Japanese FTO entry does not in any way mention a facelift, which is why I am suspicious of the usage. Also, if there was a facelift, when did it take place? Mr.choppers | ✎ 17:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All models (including the GS)received the face lift from 97+Schumiefan (talk) 15:27, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mitsubishi FTO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061022130131/http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/ir/share/pdf/e/fact0009.pdf to http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/ir/share/pdf/e/fact0009.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mitsubishi FTO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FTO Dealership Database

The Mitsubishi Dealership database (CAPS) contains every 11-digit alpha numeric of the chassis codes for the FTO, which also clearly identifies the colour of the OEM model build. A number of global Parts Sites have also employed an online version URL: https://mitsubishi.epc-data.com/fto/ - and this also evidences the relationship of colours to models, build-types and dates of production. I therefore question any removal of colour charts or charts relating to model-type build quantities which were painstakingly researched by members of the FTO Owners Club since its inception in 1998. Traders have successfully relied on this database for years, and to state in any correction that this database is irrelevant is surely incorrect? Webcor (talk) 20:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]