User talk:M@

M@ here

Hey Matt

Just heard back from Nancy about the Mall effort, I assume this year will more quiet. Anyway, I'll keep an eye on the forum on this article, although i'm not sure if it's notable enough for inclusion, if it said that anywhere, it'd probably be at WP:WEB. In any case, Wikipedia's far more worthwhile than that never ending shouting match. karmafist 04:10, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Singing magnets

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Singing magnets, by Hu (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Singing magnets is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Singing magnets, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Singing magnets itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External map service links

Hello. You have been identified as having added or removed direct external map service links in articles[1]. There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:External links#Issues with inclusion or exclusion of map service links about which should be done, and some more opinions would be good to find community consensus. --Para (talk) 23:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SchadenCode

The article SchadenCode has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced neologism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 22:46, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SchadenCode

A tag has been placed on SchadenCode, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. mhking (talk) 22:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of HopSlinger

Hello M@,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged HopSlinger for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fbergo (talk) 03:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]