User talk:DanShearer
Welcome
[edit]Carry right on... I have no objection to discussion in public but email to dan@shearer.org might work more quickly :-)
Please see the change I just made to the UML page. You said the skas3 patch is required to run UML, and unless something has changed recently, I don't believe that is the case. Am I mistaken? ~leif ☺ HELO 23:01, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- No, you are quite correct. Thanks! Dan Shearer 07:19, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)
Emulation Software / Virtualization Software
[edit]Hi Dan, sorry I took so long to get back to you. I'm easy about emulation/virtualization, except for the fact that I've been in the field for 25 years and virtualization is a very new term, although the concept has existed happily under the umbrella of emulation for a good long time. A surrounding environment imitates a usually fairly complete subset of the behavior expected by an application originally designed for execution in an different environment. I use BSD jail myself, and am aware that the distinction here is very much more subtle than the one that normally pertains in emulation, where an application runs in an environment very different from that it originally ran in. I don't really have any time to spare for this so I'm happy to leave the details in your capable hands, although I would appreciate it if you found a useful place for a category that identifies emulators. The words virtualization software is likely to be rather opaque to someone just looking for an arcade game emulator. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 22:52, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Palm hardware speeds
[edit]A statement you made on the Xcopilot article has been disputed. (Though no one has said anything about it since last April...) The article said that Palm hardware runs at 20Mhz, but current Palms seem to run faster than that.
My guess is that 20Mhz is just how fast they were when you made the edit, but I thought I'd let you know about the discussion (if you can call it that) in case you have something to add. Jobarts-Talk 02:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Good point, have clarified in the Xcopilot talk page. Thanks. Dan
Hercules screenshots
[edit]Dan:
It looks to me as if the screenshots for the Hercules article in Section 2 are not quite right...
The screenshot referenced in paragraph 1 as "below" with "All counters are zero" is configured as thumb|right.
The screenshot referenced in paragraph 2 as "To the right" with "Debian GNU/Linux 390" is configured as thumb|left.
The screenshot referenced in paragraph 3 as "on the left" with "after logging in" does not seem to exist. A search through the article edit history seems to indicate it was intended to be added here but never was.
66.102.198.242 (talk) 08:01, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
File:HerculesCaptureDEcran-HMC.gif listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HerculesCaptureDEcran-HMC.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:20, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi -- just wanted to say I'm happy to see the improvements you are making to the article. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 22:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, DanShearer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, DanShearer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MIT License, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Re: PIC
[edit]Hi, Dan! I vaguely remember using PIC when I worked back at Bell Labs in the '85-'88 era. I wrote a fair amount of troff but only rarely had to include diagrams in those documents. I do remember using another tool that was a front-end to PIC: it would allow us to create viewgraphs (transparencies) for use with overhead projectors. A couple of times I had to give presentations, and that thing would use text commands to generate simple graphics (flowcharts, pie charts, org charts) like the equivalent of a very early edition of PowerPoint. I recall that it didn't do well with embedded text blocks, so that for those slides where I was using embedded code listings, for example, I would have to generate them with "straight" troff, and then have to fight to manually put the right numbers in each set of slides -- PitA! But that program (maybe it was called vue or c-vue or something?) would spit out PIC the same way that cip would, and then we'd run it through some other driver instead of troff to make it come out on the little color printer we used for viewgraphs. I also remember that cip would frequently crash (and occasionally take out my entire BLIT) when I tried to reload complicated images and continue editing them. So I learned to keep each cip window open until I was entirely and completely done, and just keep using another window with shell to manage the files / revisions manually instead of closing the program instance. But I was only at Murray Hill for 6 to 9 months with the BLIT, and on one other contract (Whippany?) for a couple / three months; as an RV ("Resident Visitor" read: Contractor) I moved around quite a bit and was constantly working in different environments and on different platforms. (Not to mention that Bell was in the middle of the breakup then so I was working for different companies, too: Bell Laboratories, AT&T, AT&T-IS (Information Systems), BELLCORE, etc.) I don't know if these ramblings can help you at all, but you're welcome to them. :-) --Eliyahu S Talk 03:52, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit]
Hello, DanShearer. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Leantime, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 13:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Leantime, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MarioGom (talk) 13:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Leantime
[edit] Hello, DanShearer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leantime, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Just in case anyone reading this Talk page is interested in the Leantime project management software, it's dead. Definitely not worth any kind of Wikipedia mention. I tried, but it died from lack of maintainer love. Oh well. Dan Shearer (talk) 11:53, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
[edit]- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,